When They Laugh Too Fast, You've Already Lost

The Power of Silence in Stand-Up (Comedy Mindhacks #90)

Lately, when I’ve been on stage doing stand-up, there’s a weird phenomenon I’ve noticed: There are different kinds of laughs. There are pity laughs, belly laughs, laughs that linger, laughs that take a minute, and laughs that are instantaneous. The latter, the instant kind, tends to come from immediate recognition. What I mean is this: I say something the audience already knows and thinks is funny, and they laugh because I reminded them of it. They instantly recognize it.

Now, as a comedian, in general, I’ll take whatever laughs I can get. But I’ve also learned that it’s actually helpful to make some distinctions. For instance, I used to think quick laughs meant I was doing something right. That instant reaction, that no-delay laugh, the one where it’s just setup, punchline, laugh, that felt like winning. Then I realized what those laughs actually meant.

In those instances, people were laughing at something they’d already agreed with before I ever even opened my mouth. Chances are, that’s because they’ve heard it a million times already. You know what I’m talking about, jokes like: dating apps are terrible, traffic is the worst, my spouse is crazy, and so on. But that quick laugh that comes with 100% agreement is often missing a key ingredient to a great joke: tension.

Well, there’s also another kind of joke, one that comes from revelation. (I’m channeling my inner Bible scholar/theologian here.) I absolutely LOVE these kinds of laughs. These occur when I say something the audience hasn’t fully thought yet, something that creates a gap between what they expected and what I just showed them. Usually, that laugh takes a little bit longer to get because the audience has to process it. And that process, the move from confusion on to clarity on to release, is where great comedy lives.

What’s my point? Simply this: I’ve noticed that when an audience laughs immediately, I’ve probably given them something they already wanted to hear. If that’s the case, I’m probably not leading the room, just following it. I’m reading what they expect and delivering exactly that. And sure, that works, but it doesn’t stick because the joke isn’t doing anything except agreeing out loud. Besides, as the one with the mic, I want to be the one leading the room.

The jokes I’m most proud of, after all, the ones people remember, are almost always the ones that made the room uncomfortable first. And, to be clear, I’m not talking about being offensive or even edgy here. I’m just talking about delivering surprise, delivering something unexpected. It’s the kind of moment where the audience doesn’t know where I’m going and, as I keep on, they’re not sure if they should laugh yet. They hesitate and that hesitation comes from me building up the setup and letting it do its job.

Comedy comes from breaking assumptions. But I can’t break an assumption if I never build one in the first place. And I think this is where many comics miss a golden opportunity: interrupting the silence. Most comedians have heard of “stepping on laughs,” but I’d say most haven’t been told not to “step on the silence.” This happens when comedians rush to the punchline because we’re afraid of silence. We hear nothing and think the audience has lost interest. I’ve learned that, quite often, the opposite is true. That silence may well mean they’re paying attention!

It’s the same when I’m teaching college students. Many times I’ll make a point and ask if anyone has questions. Silence. I used to be frustrated by that. Then I realized: a) I must’ve explained it well enough that they have no questions; and/or, b) They’re not zoned out, they have no questions because they were paying attention. They got it. The same is true on the comedy stage. If I’ve done my job correctly, there should be pockets of silence, moments when the audience is processing and figuring out where I’m going. And when I finally deliver the turn and break the assumption cleanly, the laugh is bigger because…they had to work for it. I just had to be patient while they did so.

I’ve come up with a little test to gauge this, I’ll call it “The Laugh Test”: If the audience laughs before I finish the sentence, I’m probably not saying anything new. If they laugh the second I set up the premise, they already know the punchline and I’m definitely not saying anything new. And if they’re nodding along before I get to the turn, I’m just saying what they already think and nothing new. And that feels to me less like comedy and more like pandering.

In comedy, the goal isn’t to make the audience agree (of all people, the Late Night talk show hosts should know this…but they seem to have forgotten). The goal is to surprise and you do that by making the audience consider something they hadn’t considered before, and you do that by having tension. It’s tension that creates space between expectation and reality, as I’ve written about numerous times on this site. The wider that gap of tension, the bigger the release, that is, the bigger the laugh. But again, many comedians close or collapse that gap too early. They give away the punchline in the setup, they soften the misdirect before it happens, or they explain too much too fast because they’re afraid the audience won’t follow. And what happens? The joke lands flat, not because the punchline was bad, but because there was no tension to release.

Sitting with or in the silence doesn’t feel natural, but it’s the best chance I have when I’m on stage to let the setup breathe and to build the assumption clearly enough that the audience commits to it. And then, once I do that, only then can I break it. I think this is so important because, honestly, quick laughs can make a comedian feel good give them confidence. But quick laughs also train comedians to chase approval instead of truth. Whew!!!!!!!

That leads comedians to start writing jokes that fit what the audience already wants to hear and avoiding anything that might create tension. And eventually, after doing that long enough, comedians will stop saying anything interesting because interesting requires risk, and risk creates hesitation, and hesitation, especially if it’s accompanied by silence, feels like failure when a person’s used to instantaneous laughs.

So, I’m trying to stop measuring the success of my jokes by how fast people laugh. Instead, I’ve started measuring by whether the audience had to think first. If there’s a beat of silence, a moment where the room goes quiet before the laugh, that’s usually a good sign because it means I didn’t give them what they expected and that, in turn, means the joke did something. I also pay attention to the quality of the laugh. Is it a courtesy laugh, a polite acknowledgment, or is it a real release, something that came from genuine surprise? The difference is easy to feel once you know what to listen for.

Now, don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying every joke should be slow. Some jokes are meant to hit fast, be rapid fire, and build rhythm. Jokes like that can keep the energy moving. But…if every joke lands instantly, I’ve realized I’ve not really built anything, I’ve just basically performed a checklist of things people already agree with.

I think the best comedy sets have a mix of quick hits that keep the room warm and slow burns that make them think. If I make all of it quick and easy, I’ve lost the chance to shift how someone sees the world. And, as I alluded to above, doing stand-up comedy has taught me that the jokes that work too fast are the ones people forget, and the ones that make people uncomfortable first are the ones that stick. When people in the audience laugh too fast, it usually means I’ve given them something familiar. And familiar is fine, but it’s not memorable. Better comedy makes people uncomfortable first, then releases the tension. That’s why the real laughs aren’t in agreement but revelation.

JOKE WRITING COURSE: By the way, if you have any interest at all in learning about your persona, how to write some jokes, or doing stand-up comedy, check out my online joke writing course, “The Joke Writer’s Lab,” HERE.

JOKE MEMORY COURSE: My companion course to “The Joke Writer’s Lab” is now live: “The Comedian’s Memory Lab.” Learn how to conceptualize, organize, and memorize your entire comedy set. This method works for 10 jokes or 100, a set that’s 3 minutes of 1 hour. You can get it HERE.